Monday, February 17, 2014

"Stitches" and "Maus" Are Memorable!

As a matter of course, I don't read graphic novels. There isn't any real reason behind why I don't. I just never "got into" them. But between yesterday and today, I have read two different memoir graphic novels. The first is Stitches: A Memoir by David Small, which is an assigned book for the class that I co-teach and I figured I should read it as my students are just finishing it up. The second is Maus: A Survivor's Tale by Art Spiegelman, which I had heard about while visiting the campus of Phillips Academy in Andover. One of the great things about graphic novels is the ease of reading. Stitches took me all of an hour to read and Maus just slight longer - around 5 hours. As I mentioned yesterday, a memoir needs to have three components: it must be well written, keep the reader's interest throughout, and the author has to have a clear purpose. How do Stitches and Maus measure up?

Stitches: A Memoir

Summary: David Small, a best-selling and highly regarded children's book illustrator, comes forward with this unflinching graphic memoir. Remarkable and intensely dramatic, Stitches tells the story of a fourteen-year-old boy who awakes one day from a supposedly harmless operation to discover that he has been transformed into a virtual mute—a vocal cord removed, his throat slashed and stitched together like a bloody boot. From horror to hope, Small proceeds to graphically portray an almost unbelievable descent into adolescent hell and the difficult road to physical, emotional, and artistic recovery.

Review: David Small is an award winning children's author/illustrator, but I have never read any of his books. In some ways, not knowing the author's previous work makes this graphic novel even more enjoyable. I will start by saying that both the story and the art are excellent! The story revolves around David Small from the age of 6 to adulthood. He comes from an interesting but dysfunctional family -- his mother and her side of the family are explored in depth. David develops a growth on his neck, which turns out to be cancer. However, his family choose not tell him this fact, which is just one of the many sources of conflict between him and his parents. I love how the story is told. The struggles David goes through growing up within this family are real and relatable. David (the character in the book) can be extraordinarily imaginative, which is shown throughout the story (i.e., his admiration for Alice in Wonderland, which appears again towards the end of the story). In the end, the story has a great moral lesson -- your voice is more than the words that come out of your mouth. It is also your actions, what you do and how you do them, that speak for you. That is a great message to learn from a book about a child growing up.

The art is black, white, and gray, and in this story, it works perfectly. Some of the best frames in the book are when the author uses a direct light source on his character. For example, when David is in an elevator, and the doors open and close, he creates a fantastic effect by using this lighting technique. It happens a few times in the story, and it is definitely worth stopping to study the frame and look at the detail.

Finally, I believe that this story could only be told in this way. It just would not have been as effective if it had bee told in a traditional book. You need the art, combined with the story, David's vivid imagination, and the writer's control of his limited words to feel the full impact of the story. Telling the story of his memories works very nicely as a graphic novel. Yes, it did take me only about an hour to read the book, but I think that was too fast, and I plan to go back and read it again - taking more time to study each frame. I highly recommend this book for its great story and artwork, even if you know nothing about the author. By the time you are done reading, you will feel like you know him personally. Stitches is three for three in my memoir requirements.

Rating: 5 out of 5 stars

Maus: A Survivor's Tale

Summary: "The Pulitzer Prize-winning Maus tells the story of Vladek Spiegelman, a Jewish survivor of Hitler's Europe, and his son, a cartoonist coming to terms with his father's story. Vladek's harrowing narrative is woven into the author's account of his anguished relationship with is aging father." (from the back cover)

Review: Art Spiegelman's Maus: A Survivor's Tale is a unique and unforgettable work of literature and has been described as memoir, biography, history, fiction, autobiography, or a mix of genres. It is a two-volume set of book-length graphic novels, which tells the story of the narrator, Artie, and his father Vladek, a Holocaust survivor. Maus (trans: mouse) is an important example of both Holocaust literature and the graphic novel. The two volumes of Maus are subtitled "My Father Bleeds History" and "And Here My Troubles Began"; they should be read together to get the biggest impact.

Artie is a comic book artist who is trying to create art that is meaningful, not just commercial. As the two volumes unfold, he gradually learns the full story of his father's history as a Jewish survivor of the Holocaust. There is a complex "book within the book" motif, since the main character is actually writing the book that is being read. Is the story accurate? Probably not, but as with all Holocaust literature, it is not about accuracy but the humanity or inhumanity of the story. It is almost certain that the elderly Vladek forgot, exaggerated, or hid details, just as it is certain that his son summarized and misunderstood the account.

The distinguishing premise of the book involves depicting the books' human characters as having animal heads. All the Jews have mice heads, the Germans are cats, the non-Jewish Poles pigs, the Americans dogs, etc. It is a visually provocative device, although not without problematic aspects. To his credit, Spiegelman addresses some of the ambiguities of this visual device in the course of the 2 volumes. For example, there is an extensive discussion between Artie and his wife, a Frenchwoman who converted to Judaism, regarding what kind of animal head she should have in the comic (rabbit, frog, mouse?).

The art is black and white and contains some stunning visual touches, as well as some truly painful and thought-provoking dialogue. Vladek is one of the most extraordinary characters in 20th century literature. As grim as the two books' subject matter is, there are some moments of humor and warmth.

What makes Spiegelman's work so moving is the juxtaposition of a supposedly lighthearted form, the comic strip, with the greatest evil and suffering in human history, the Holocaust. Spiegelman's parents miraculously survived the concentration camps, being among very few survivors, getting by on luck and (in the case of Vladek) a lot of resourcefulness. This is their story, from the point of view of the father, who lost nearly all of his relatives. With the Jews as mice and the Nazis as cats, this work pulls no punches in describing the true horrors of the Holocaust, and Spiegelman's minimalist artwork makes the images all the more disturbing. You don't get this kind of emotion, terror, and brutal honesty in standard written accounts of the period. But underneath the direct suffering of the Holocaust, the true theme of this book is the lasting effects on the Spiegelman family, including the father's lasting agony and the mental illness shared by both the author's mother and himself. The strained relationship between father and son are the true heart of this tremendous work. Overall, Maus is a profound reflection on family ties, history, memory, and the role of the artist in society. I highly recommend this book. Maus is also a three for three in my memoir requirements, even though this is not strictly a memoir.

Rating: 5 out of 5 stars

Sunday, February 16, 2014

It's Boring "Following Atticus"...

I have mixed feelings about memoirs. Some memoirs are brilliant and should be read by everyone; others - readers should just pass by. What constitutes a good memoir? For me, it must be well written, keep the reader's interest throughout the story, and have a clear purpose for writing the story. This month, my book club's selected book is a sports/adventure/dog-loving memoir, Following Atticus: Forty-eight High Peaks, One Little Dog, and an Extraordinary Friendship by Tom Ryan. I'm not certain what prompted the suggestion to read this book by a member of the club, but I'm sure she had her reasoning. 

Synopsis: "After a close friend died of cancer, middle-aged, overweight, acrophobic newspaperman Tom Ryan decided to pay tribute to her in a most unorthodox manner. Ryan and his friend, miniature schnauzer Atticus M. Finch, would attempt to climb all forty-eight of New Hampshire's four thousand-foot peaks twice in one winter while raising money for charity. It was an adventure of a lifetime, leading them across hundreds of miles and deep into an enchanting but dangerous winter wonderland. At the heart of the amazing journey was the extraordinary relationship they shared, one that blurred the line between man and dog.

Following Atticus is an unforgettable true saga of adventure, friendship, and the unlikeliest of family, as one remarkable animal opens the eyes and heart of a tough-as-nails newspaperman to the world's beauty and its possibilities." (from the dust jacket)

Review: I really wanted to like this book but sadly, I did not. Of my three requirements for what consistutes a good memoir, this book had none of them. At first, I found the story interesting. But the moments that I found most interesting were the ones that Ryan wrote about the least. The early chapters of the book deal with his life as an underground muck-raking newspaperman here in the small town of Newburyport, MA (where I live). He writes about all the incestuous weirdness that goes on in small towns. I didn't actually know anything about any of this, therefore, I found it interesting and refreshing. 

After that initial thrill, the book goes sharply downhill. When he gets into his mountain hiking jag, Ryan quickly becomes repetitious. He's hiking the same 48 mountains over and over and over and over again. How many different ways can the scenic view from the top of a mountain be described? How many times do we want to hear about the therapeutic value of solitary wilderness? How cold it was or how difficult the climb? I don't see what the big deal is hiking up and down the same small mountains year after year. The book is very self-indulgent. The author comes across as nice guy, but also extremely lonely. His only close companion is a little miniature schnauzer which Ryan drags up one mountain peak after another, and he makes up multiple charity quests as a reason to keep hiking the same mountains.  All I kept thinking is "why do I care about any of this?" The answer was simple: "I don't care."

The worst part is that so many chapters were identical. Cliff hanger to start, cold/snowy/tired, awesome views, and then a very anticlimactic end. It's just not very strong writing and completely lacking any real plot. This story would have made a great magazine article, but not a book. Therefore, if you intend to read the book, I suggest you stop at page 64 and don't waste your time on the last 200 pages.

It should be noted that I (apparently) am in the minority about this book. Most reviews on Amazon are glowing, which I don't comprehend but to each their own.

Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
Atticus is a really cute dog, though.

Saturday, February 15, 2014

Don't Waste Your Money on These Items!

As I was putting on my gloves today to head out to run a couple of quick errands, I noticed that my very expensive Barbour lambswool gloves which cost me $50 had a small hole. ARGH! That's when I started to realize that I foolishly spend way too much money for certain products which ends up being unnecessary expenses. There are three very specific products no one should spend a lot of money when purchasing: gloves, sunglasses, and umbrellas.
 
Why? I have found that these three items are the items which are easily lost, easily broken, or easily stolen. In 1986, I spent $80 on sunglasses only to have those glasses go missing two weeks later (cost today: $160). A few years ago, I spent $60 on an umbrella which just snapped in a bad rainstorm a couple of months after purchase. Another $40 umbrella went missing from a NYC restaurant (stolen). Let's not mention the recently purchased and torn $50 lambswool gloves.

Conversely, when I've spent very little money on items ($10 sunglasses from a NYC street vendor, $15 drugstore umbrellas, and $8 Target gloves), those items have lasted me years. On the rare occasion that one of those cheaper items goes missing or breaks, I don't care nearly as much because I haven't wasted a ton of money on them. The more expensive gloves don't keep my fingers any warmer than their cheaper counterpart. As long as the umbrellas keeps the rain off, do I need a fancy one? As long as my eyes are shielded with UV protection, then sunglasses are sunglasses.

So folks, save your money.  Buy cheap on these three items!

Friday, February 14, 2014

What Kinds of Children are we Raising?

I am not a parent, so take my observations and commentary as someone who has no real vested interest in a specific child, but in children as a whole. Something occurred in my classroom yesterday and it has been sticking my craw ever since.  Here's the scenario:

One of my students (whom I'll call Jane) asked to go to the bathroom, which I gave her permission to do so. About 10 minutes later, a student who is not one of my students, but is one of our more notorious students, comes barging into my classroom and heads straight to the desk where Jane was sitting. I explained to this incredibly rude student that her barging into my classroom was unacceptable and that she needed to leave. To which she replies, "Just wait, Miss, I need to get something."  I again repeated that she has no business being in my classroom and needed to leave. She blatantly ignored me and proceeded to gather up all of Jane's items (backpack, jacket, etc.) and leaves my room. As she is leaving my room, I explained that she was never to do that again and that I would be writing her up. Her reply: "Alright, miss - Shut up!"  I followed her out and asked if I had heard her correctly, to which she replied, "yeah, shut up!" I then proceeded to lecture my class about this student's incredibly rude behavior and the consequences of this type of behavior when they are out in the world. I then had to write up both girls - one for her rude behavior and the other for being AWOL.

When I mentioned this confrontation to the assistant principal, he sort of chortled and said "That's [student's name] being [student's name]." Yes, he laughed about it, but did tell me to write it up and that he will "talk" to her. <sigh> The behavior that many of the students in my school display and the lack of consequences for their behavior saddens me. Following up yesterday's incident, today I had two separate run ins with each student and so the battle of wills begins.

As I mentioned, the extremely impertinent student is notorious. Last year, this child spent most of her time in school cutting class and wandering the halls. Therefore, to "fix" this behavior, administration made a deal with the student that if she attends certain core classes, she can "work" in the office helping the school secretary with odd jobs during her other classes. What the...? What? How is that remotely helping this girl?

So it comes back to my question: What kinds of children are we raising? When we allow children exhibit bad behavior and fail to set up certain boundaries and consequences for their actions, we end up with a bunch of entitled, obnoxious brats who feel that they can do whatever they want -- or at least, this is the case where I work. I'm hoping this is not a worldwide pandemic.

I'm not saying that children should not have independent thoughts and that they need to be little robots at all times.  That would be awful, but when independence crosses over into insolence, that's when we have problems. What is going to happen to these children when they have to go out into the world and be productive adults? They are going to have a very unpleasant awakening!

Rant over.  I feel better having gotten that off my chest.

Tuesday, February 11, 2014

It's Okay to be Smart!

I keep hearing that "smart is the new sexy".  If that were the case, I'd be on the cover of Vogue magazine. But so far, Anna Wintour has not been knocking my door. As I'm partially terrified that I'm going to end up like my mother - with Alzheimers, I like to keep learning new things, which I hear will keep the dementia at bay. 

To that end, I've been on a science kick of late. Yesterday, a posting from PBS hit my newsfeed on Facebook. It was a link to a PBS Digital Videos YouTube site, called It's Okay to be Smart. The specific video link was about The Science of Kissing, which explains the science behind why we feel need to smooch. It's a really fascinating video.

It's Okay to be Smart is "is a blog and a YouTube show about science. But it’s probably not about science the way you’re used to it" (from the blog site). It's the brainchild of Joe Hanson, Ph.D. biologist and host/writer of PBS Digital Studios.

After watching that first video about the Science of Kissing, I set out to watch as much of the entire series that I could. The videos are not only informative and interesting, but Dr. Hanson is amusing. Some of my favorite videos are How Science Defines a Year, The Science of Snowflakes, and The Odds of Finding Life and Love.

I decided to post the video that I found to be the most fascinating. It's called Amazing Animal Superpowers and Dr. Hanson shows how art really does imitate life. If you have ever wondered where comic book writers get their ideas for their superheroes, perhaps it's from watching the animal kingdom and some of the weird and wonderful things that they can do. Check it out - engage your brain!

Monday, February 10, 2014

Puppies!!!

I just had to post this commercial because I got such a feeling of joy when I watched it.

I think every television ad should feature cute little puppies. I love McVitie's Original Digestives and this commercial makes me hope that the next time I buy them there's a puppy inside. I'm going to be disappointed if there isn't one. After all, there should be truth in advertisting.

Warning: Cute puppy overload!
February 15, 2014 Update: Today, I bought a package of Digestives and there were no puppies in the pack and I was disappointed.  <sniff>  Can I sue McVitie's for false advertisement?

Sunday, February 9, 2014

"Ladies and Gentlemen, The Beatles!"

At 8:00 pm on February 9, 1964, four lads from Liverpool wearing "tight, dandified Edwardian-Beatnik suits and great pudding bowls of hair" (from a scathing review in Newsweek) made their first live US performance on The Ed Sullivan Show in New York City. They were, of course, the Beatles. A then record setting 73 million people tuned in that evening to watch this unprecedented event, making it one of the seminal moments in television history. And the world has not been the same since!

On that first appearance, the Beatles performed five songs in two sets: set one: "All My Loving", "Till There Was You", and "She Loves You"; set two: "I Saw Her Standing There" and "I Want to Hold Your Hand". They performed among a shrieking audience of fans and so began Beatlemania in the United States. Well, technically Beatlemania started in early December 1963 when a Washington DC area disc jockey, Carroll James, started playing a bootleg copy of "I Want to Hold Your Hand" - far in advance of the mid-January 1964 scheduled release date - and America's youth fell in love with the Fab Four. Upon landing at John F. Kennedy Airport on February 7, 1964, the Beatles were greeted by an estimated 3,000 screaming fans. So started the "British Invasion". After the boys' February 9 appearance, the Beatles went on to perform on The Ed Sullivan Show on the next two consecutive Sundays; although, technically their February 23 appearance was recorded before the February 9 appearance. The Beatles would appear one more time on The Ed Sullivan Show in September 1965.

Tonight at 8:00 pm, CBS will be airing The Night That Changed America, which is "a celebration of the Beatles' 50th anniversary appearance on The Ed Sullivan Show [and] includes performances from Paul McCartney and Ringo Starr. Other performers: Katy Perry, Alicia Keys, John Legend, Maroon 5, Imagine Dragons, John Mayer, and Keith Urban." Who the heck are the Imagine Dragons? Anyway, this event promises to be an amazing night. Of course, as it goes right up against the Olympics in primetime, I'll be DVR-ing the celebration to enjoy at a later time. Sorry, lads!

In honor of the 50th anniversary:  "Ladies and Gentlemen, The Beatles!"

Here is a portion of the Beatles second appearance a week later (February 16) on The Ed Sullivan Show, from the Deauville Hotel in Miami Beach, which includes one of my favorites, "This Boy":

And finally, the Beatles third appearance on February 23, 1964 with yet another favorite of mine "Twist and Shout" (yeah, okay, I have lots of favorites):